.Google.com's Martin Splitt addressed an inquiry in the SEO Office Hrs podcast about whether reproducing YouTube video clip information into message on a website page would be actually seen as replicate content and possess an adverse influence on the websites rankings.Although replicate information is certainly not a negative ranking variable, content published on a much more reliable site may cause the material on the a lot less reliable website to become outranked. It's an authentic concern to ask considering that web content on a reliable is going to outrank the exact same material on a less reliable one.Some in the search neighborhood refer to one part of web content usurping the ranks of one more as 'cannibalization' of the website's ranking ability. This is actually the concern of the individual requesting the inquiry.Google.com's Martin Splitt told the sent inquiry:." If I make a YouTube video recording and then take that exact content or even content and also place it on a website, could Google flag that website page or even site for duplicate content?".Various Web Content Media Are Actually Treated As Separate.Martin Splitt responded to that both types of web content are actually various and also will definitely certainly not be actually handled as the same material, thereby posting text material extracted from an online video will certainly not be actually thought about reproduce information.This is his response:." No, one is an online video as well as the various other one is text information, which would be actually distinct content!".Printing Drew Out Text Coming From Video Clip.Martin complimented the concept of extracting text content coming from a video and republishing it as text, keeping in mind that some folks choose to eat web content in content kind instead of watching a video recording. Reversing the flow of web content from text message to audio or even video clip is perhaps certainly not a negative concept also since some people have trouble reading through message material and also may prefer listening to it coming from a video recording or a podcast layout.Martin discussed printing video content in a textual model:." It's likewise not a negative tip, some customers (like me) may choose a content model and others may not be able to use a video version of the web content from the beginning because of bandwidth or even aesthetic constraints.".Takeaways.The suggestion responsible for the question is actually repurposing material as well as it is actually a good suggestion. Browse is actually greater than Google, it's additionally YouTube and also any place folks get their audio content, like Spotify. The reality that there is no cannibalization of the information between tools creates repurposing a viable approach to prolonging your material grasp.Listen to the podcast at the 8:20 min mark:.Included Graphic by Shutterstock/Roman Samborskyi.